🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities will be cut by over 50%, following a controversial law change that forced municipal councils to put the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include one or more councillors based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils could only establish a Māori ward by first submitting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, stating communities should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to end “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to create other types of wards – such as rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions placed on Māori wards indicated the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that voted to retain their wards.