🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test recently after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content appear to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."