🔗 Share this article

In my role as a game master, I traditionally avoided extensive use of chance during my D&D adventures. I tended was for story direction and what happened in a game to be guided by player choice rather than the roll of a die. Recently, I opted to alter my method, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Seeing an Improvised Tool

A popular actual-play show features a DM who frequently requests "fate rolls" from the players. This involves picking a type of die and outlining consequences contingent on the number. This is essentially no unlike rolling on a pre-generated chart, these get invented in the moment when a player's action doesn't have a clear outcome.

I decided to try this technique at my own session, mostly because it looked novel and provided a break from my normal practice. The results were remarkable, prompting me to reconsider the perennial balance between planning and randomization in a D&D campaign.

A Memorable Story Beat

In a recent session, my players had survived a city-wide fight. When the dust settled, a cleric character inquired after two friendly NPCs—a sibling duo—had made it. Instead of choosing an outcome, I let the dice decide. I told the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: a low roll, both were killed; on a 5-9, only one would die; on a 10+, they survived.

The player rolled a 4. This led to a deeply moving sequence where the party discovered the remains of their allies, still holding hands in their final moments. The party held a ceremony, which was particularly powerful due to earlier roleplaying. As a final touch, I decided that the remains were suddenly transformed, containing a spell-storing object. I randomized, the item's magical effect was exactly what the group lacked to solve another critical quest obstacle. One just plan such magical moments.

Sharpening DM Agility

This incident made me wonder if improvisation and making it up are truly the beating heart of this game. While you are a detail-oriented DM, your skill to pivot can rust. Adventurers frequently find joy in ignoring the most carefully laid plans. Therefore, a good DM has to be able to adapt swiftly and fabricate scenarios in the moment.

Using luck rolls is a excellent way to practice these skills without straying too much outside your preparation. The strategy is to apply them for minor decisions that have a limited impact on the campaign's main plot. As an example, I would avoid using it to determine if the central plot figure is a traitor. Instead, I might use it to figure out if the party enter a room just in time to see a key action occurs.

Strengthening Shared Narrative

Luck rolls also helps make players feel invested and cultivate the sensation that the story is dynamic, progressing based on their choices as they play. It prevents the feeling that they are merely characters in a DM's sole story, thereby bolstering the cooperative nature of storytelling.

Randomization has historically been part of the game's DNA. Early editions were enamored with encounter generators, which suited a playstyle focused on treasure hunting. Even though modern D&D frequently prioritizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the required method.

Finding the Right Balance

Absolutely no problem with being prepared. Yet, equally valid no issue with relinquishing control and allowing the rolls to decide some things rather than you. Control is a major aspect of a DM's responsibilities. We require it to run the game, yet we frequently find it hard to cede it, at times when doing so could be beneficial.

My final recommendation is this: Have no fear of letting go of the reins. Try a little improvisation for minor details. It may create that the surprising result is infinitely more rewarding than anything you would have planned in advance.